Intel’s Entry-Level Panter Lake Integrated Graphics Trails AMD Radeon 840M by 26%

• June 11, 2026

Recent benchmarking by Notebookcheck has brought to light performance comparisons between the entry-level integrated graphics in Intel’s Panter Lake series and AMD’s Radeon 840M. The review focused on the Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14, equipped with an Intel Core Ultra 5 322 processor. This particular chip represents the low end of Intel’s Panter Lake lineup, featuring the Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 GPU.

Performance Gap Between Intel and AMD Entry-Level GPUs

The Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 integrated GPU inside the Core Ultra 5 322 is characterized by its modest configuration of two graphics cores and 16 shader units. This setup defines it as the most basic graphics solution in the Panter Lake generation. In benchmarking tests, this integrated solution exhibited about 26% lower performance compared to the AMD Radeon 840M, a rival entry-level GPU commonly found in older or budget-oriented laptops.

This performance discrepancy highlights the challenges Intel faces in boosting the efficiency of its integrated GPUs at the entry level, where power constraints and cost considerations strongly influence design choices. AMD’s Radeon 840M, despite its age, still manages to outperform Intel’s latest minimal integrated graphics option in key benchmarks, signaling a performance gap in this category.

The Lenovo IdeaPad 5i 2-in-1 14 provided the testing platform for these comparisons. The device’s configuration includes the Intel Core Ultra 5 322 processor, which enables a direct assessment of this graphical solution’s capabilities in a mainstream laptop form factor. Notebookcheck’s conclusions point to the Intel Graphics 2 Xe3 GPU being best suited for very basic graphical tasks, limiting its appeal to users requiring more from their graphics hardware.

While Intel’s Panter Lake series introduces new architectural improvements and features, the entry-level integrated graphics unit appears to lag behind competing AMD options, particularly in budget or lower-tier laptop segments. This finding suggests potential buyers looking for modest GPU performance may find better value with competing solutions or higher-tier Intel configurations.

Details such as pricing, availability, and further technical comparisons were not disclosed in the testing results. However, these performance insights provide important context for consumers and OEMs evaluating low-power integrated GPUs in upcoming notebook releases.

Tests reveal Intel’s entry-level Panter Lake integrated graphics lags behind AMD’s Radeon 840M by about 26%, reflecting performance challenges.